Let’s Stop Calling It “Content”
Hollywood and tech firms want to reduce culture to a slurry of interchangeable bits. Let’s not help them out
I remember the first time I started hearing the word “content”.
It was back in the late 1990s, during the delirious height of the “dot com” boom. Corporations were rolling out web sites, the hawt digital technology of the day. These companies all wanted their web-sites to be “sticky” — i.e. to give people a reason to stick around. That meant they needed to have lots of arresting, cool stuff to read and view. And that meant they were commissioning articles, photography, animations, and occasionally even short films or commercials (though most Americans still had dial-up modems that made online video farcically slow).
It was thus, for a brief year or so, a weirdly good time to be a writer, a photographer, or an illustrator. Money for one’s work was plentiful.
The only unsettling thing for me was the terminology. All those companies building web sites, and all their creative directors and the folks running the web-design startups, kept collapsing these very different forms of culture — writing and photography and animation and illustration — into one all-fungible phrase:
